The Statutory Exposures a Buyer's Advisor Will Find If You Don't Clear Them First

Our general due diligence checklist tells you what documents to gather. This post covers something narrower and more specific: the handful of Indian statutes that turn a document gap into a number a buyer's advisor uses against your price — and that most sellers don't know to check until someone else checks it for them.

MSME Payment Discipline (Section 16, MSMED Act + Section 43B(h), Income Tax Act)

If your business has been paying micro or small enterprise suppliers beyond the statutory 45-day window, two things are already true whether or not you've noticed them.

First, Section 16 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act makes you liable for compound interest with monthly rests, at three times the bank rate notified by the Reserve Bank of India — overriding any contrary agreement with the supplier. On a stale ₹40 lakh payable, that compounds into a real number fast, and it doesn't reset just because you haven't been asked for it yet.

Second, since Section 43B(h) of the Income Tax Act took effect from 1 April 2024, any amount still payable to a micro or small enterprise at year-end can only be claimed as a tax deduction once it's actually paid. A habit of stretching MSME payables isn't just an interest exposure sitting quietly on your books — it's a hidden addition to your own taxable income, one that shows up the moment a buyer's CA reruns the numbers during diligence rather than trusting your filed return.

Before you list: pull your MSME-1 return and your supplier ageing report, identify anyone registered as a micro or small enterprise who's been paid late, and clear the overdue balance. It's a cheap fix in isolation and an expensive one to explain mid-negotiation.

Director Loan Accounts and Related-Party Transactions (Sections 185/186, Companies Act)

Money moved between the company and promoters, their relatives, or group entities is restricted by law, not just discouraged by good practice. Section 185 of the Companies Act restricts a company from lending to its directors or entities they control, subject to narrow exceptions. Section 186 separately caps how much a company can lend or invest more broadly, extending the restriction to related companies.

A director's loan account that's been quietly growing for years — the "temporary" advance that never got repaid — reads to a buyer's lawyer as a compliance breach layered on top of an undisclosed related-party exposure. It's exactly the kind of finding that gets used to renegotiate price after you've already anchored a number, and it's fully within your control to fix before a buyer ever sees the ledger.

Before you list: review the director's loan account for the full look-back period a buyer will ask for, and settle or formally document any outstanding balance at arm's length.

Slump Sale Net Worth: Book Value Isn't the Whole Story Anymore

If you're likely to sell as a going concern for a lump sum, your capital gains are computed under Section 50B of the Income Tax Act as sale consideration minus the undertaking's "net worth." Older guidance (including some still circulating) treats net worth as simply book value of assets minus liabilities. That changed with a 2021 amendment: Rule 11UAE now requires net worth to be computed as the higher of book value or fair market value, using a prescribed valuation method for certain assets.

In practice, this closes an undervaluation route that used to let sellers report a lower book net worth to shrink the taxable gain. If your books carry land, buildings, or other assets well below current market value — common after years of depreciation with no revaluation — expect your actual taxable gain in a slump sale to be calculated against the higher FMV figure, not the lower number on your balance sheet. Run this calculation with your CA before you're negotiating price against a buyer who's already assumed the lower number.

Employee Continuity Depends on Deal Structure, Not Just Goodwill

Whether you owe a gratuity or severance obligation at the moment of sale can depend entirely on how the deal is structured, not on how you treat your employees. In a share sale, the employing entity never changes, so nothing is triggered. In an asset or slump sale, Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act requires the buyer to either continue employees on terms no less favourable, with tenure carried forward, or treat the change as a retrenchment and pay accordingly.

This is worth deciding early, with your CA and lawyer, rather than discovering mid-negotiation that your preferred deal structure quietly created a payout obligation you hadn't budgeted for.

Quick Reference

Exposure	Where It Shows Up	Statutory Basis
Overdue MSME supplier payments	MSME-1 return, supplier ageing	Compound interest at 3x RBI bank rate (Sec 16, MSMED Act); tax deduction disallowed until paid (Sec 43B(h), Income Tax Act)
Director loan accounts	Director's loan ledger	Sections 185/186, Companies Act
Slump sale capital gains	Asset/liability schedule at sale	Section 50B computation; FMV under Rule 11UAE if higher than book net worth
Employee continuity on asset/slump transfer	HR records, gratuity provisioning	Section 25FF, Industrial Disputes Act

Where This Fits

This isn't a replacement for the full process — for the complete document request list and how to run a data room, see our due diligence checklist for sellers. For the tax comparison between share, asset, and slump sale structures in full, see asset sale vs. share sale in India. For how GST treats a going-concern transfer differently from an itemized asset sale, see GST on business sale in India. Clear the exposures above before a buyer's advisor runs the same checks — the price impact of finding them yourself is a fraction of the price impact of having them found for you.

---

Preparing your business for sale and want a second set of eyes on exposures like these before you list? Contact us — we help Indian business owners get their houses in order before a buyer's diligence team does it for them.